Cards › Brilliant Stars › #120
Bidoof - Brilliant Stars (#120)
- Number
- 120
- Illustrator
- Oswaldo KATO
- Energy
- Colorless
It constantly gnaws on logs and rocks to whittle down its front teeth. It nests alongside water.
Bidoof - Brilliant Stars
Bidoof is a Common Pokémon card from the Brilliant Stars Pokémon TCG set, released 2022, illustrated by Oswaldo KATO. It sits at card number 120 in the Brilliant Stars checklist, classified as a Colorless-type Pokémon with 70 HP and the Basic subtype.
In collector terms, this is a common card. The stored TCGplayer market reference for reverseHolofoil is $0.33. This is the highest available reference across the 2 listed variants. Available values are listed below; inconsistent ranges are hidden.
Bidoof has been printed 9 times across different sets. The variant you're looking at (#120 in Brilliant Stars) is one of them - see every other printing further down to compare art, rarity, and current market price across all versions.
CIV 72Strong
Strong market heat. Weak icon status.
30 / 90 / 365-day price momentum.
Cultural recognition + iconic-set bonus.
Release-window weight.
Price references USD
Card record updated 2026-10-31. The source's price refresh time is not available. A history snapshot records stored values and does not confirm a new source update.
Where to buy on eBay live marketplace
Live listings load on-demand for cards above $5 market price. For this card, search eBay directly:
Search eBay manually →Market price history
Sale History 51 sales · since 2022-02-01
| Date | Grade | Price | Lot |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAW | $0.10 | ||
| RAW | $0.23 | ||
| RAW | $0.14 | ||
| RAW | $0.23 | ||
| RAW | $0.42 | ||
| RAW | $0.12 | ||
| RAW | $0.09 | ||
| RAW | $0.25 | ||
| RAW | $1.17 | ||
| RAW | $1.17 | ||
| RAW | $1.16 | ||
| RAW | $1.19 | ||
| RAW | $1.49 | ||
| RAW | $1.71 | ||
| RAW | $1.33 | ||
| RAW | $1.22 | ||
| RAW | $1.39 | ||
| RAW | $1.32 | ||
| RAW | $1.07 | ||
| RAW | $1.06 | ||
| RAW | $1.27 | ||
| RAW | $1.04 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.74 | ||
| RAW | $0.36 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $1.16 | ||
| RAW | $1.18 | ||
| RAW | $1.24 | ||
| RAW | $1.00 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $1.10 | ||
| RAW | $1.11 | ||
| RAW | $1.28 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $0.99 | ||
| RAW | $1.16 | ||
| RAW | $1.16 | ||
| RAW | $1.25 | ||
| RAW | $1.23 | ||
| RAW | $1.24 | ||
| RAW | $1.24 | ||
| RAW | $1.16 | ||
| RAW | $0.50 |
Bidoof FAQ
Pricing and details from this card's stored record.
How much is Bidoof from Brilliant Stars worth?
The stored TCGplayer market reference for reverseHolofoil is $0.33. The headline selects the highest available reference across the listed variants. Card record updated 2026-10-31. The source's price refresh time is not available. Reference prices are not guaranteed sale prices. The variant table shows the available values; inconsistent ranges are hidden. Historical chart values may use different sources or variants.
How rare is Bidoof?
This printing is a common card (the card is labeled "Common" on the checklist). Bidoof has been printed 9 times across different sets - earlier or limited printings often command premiums even when the rarity tier is identical.
Who illustrated Bidoof?
Oswaldo KATO illustrated this card. See Oswaldo KATO's full Catchinary page for every Pokémon card they've drawn, grouped by set with current market prices, career stats, and alt-art highlights.
When was Bidoof released?
The Brilliant Stars set released in 2022, so this card (#120 in the set) has been available since then. Its current and historical market price is tracked above.
Where can I buy Bidoof?
The "Where to buy on eBay" panel above shows live listings. For long-term holds, consider graded copies (PSA / CGC) which trade separately and usually at a premium over raw.
Is Bidoof legal in Standard format?
Check the current Pokémon TCG format rules and this exact printing's eligibility before tournament play. A card's age or set alone does not confirm its legality.